Axelrod vs. Woodward On Morning Joe (VIDEO)

When Bob Woodward and David Axelrod met this morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, everyone watching had a right to expect a back and forth between the two over Woodward’s suggestion that he had been threatened at worst or intimidated at best by an e-mail from the President’s economic adviser, Gene Sperling. The disagreement between the White House and Woodward stemmed from Woodward’s assertion that the President Obama “moved the goal posts” on revenue when negotiating on a grand bargain with John Boehner and the resulting sequester that followed when those talks broke down. The text of the e-mails is below followed by the video from this morning. You decide for yourself if Woodward was “threatened.”
From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013 Bob: I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.) I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously. My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize. Gene From Woodward to Sperling on Feb. 23, 2013 Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html#ixzz2MKcgD4Tu

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 

Author: David Phillips

What say you, the people?